Sunday, 31 August 2014

The Masters who Guided helena Blavatsky



The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky
10.
Blavatsky on Herself: From Mahatma Letters to Sinnett: Appendix
“I have learnt my English from Him! (Master K.H.) I was taught dreadful Yorkshire by my nurse called’governess’.  From the time my father brought me to England, when I was fourteen, thinking I spoke beautiful English—and people asked him if he had me educated in Yorkshire and Ireland—and laughed at my accent and my way of speaking—I gave up English altogether, trying to avoid speaking it as much as I could. From fourteen till I was over forty I never spoke it, let alone writing and forgot it entirely. I could read—which I did very little—in English—I could not speak it. I remember how difficult it was for me to understand a well-written book so far back only as 1867 in Venice. All I knew when I came to America in 1873 was to speak a little. I wish people saw an article I once attempted to write for ‘The Banner of Light’ when instead of ‘ sanguine’ I put ‘sanguinary’, etc. I learnt to write it through ‘Isis’
Letter No. 140, Jan 6 1886,
From Master K.H. to Sinnett: Feb 1882.
My Brother—I have been on a long journey after supreme knowledge, I took a long time to rest. Then upon coming back I had to give all my time to duty and all my thoughts to the Great Problem. It is all over now……and I am my Self once more. But what is Self? Only a passing guest, whose concerns are like a mirage of the great desert……
…….Look around you my friend: see the “three poisons raging within the heart of man—anger, greed, delusion, and the five obscurities—envy, passion, vacillation, sloth, and unbelief—ever preventing them seeing truth. They will never get rid of the pollution of their vain, wicked hearts, nor perceive the spiritual portion of themselves. Will you not try for the sake of shortening the distance between us—to disentangle yourself from the net of life and death in which they are caught, to cherish less—lust and desire? Young Portman is seriously meditating to leave all, to come over to us, and “become a Tibetan Monk” as he puts it. His ideas are singularly mixed up on the two entirely different characteristics and qualifications of the “Monk” or ‘Lama’ and the living “Lha”, or ‘Brother’……
………We may be anxious to befriend such as we have an interest in, and yet be as helpless to do so, as is one who sees a friend engulfed in a stormy sea when no boat is near to be launched and his personal strength is paralysed by a stronger hand that keeps him back. Yes, I see your thought….but you are wrong. Blame not the holy man for strictly doing his duty by humanity. Had it not been for the Chohan and his restraining influence you would not be reading now again a letter from your Trans-Himalayan correspondent. The world of the plains is antagonistic to that of the mountains, that you know but what you do not know  is the great harm produced by your own unconscious indiscretions……
…….I can come nearer to you, but you must draw me by a purified heart and a gradually developing will. Like the needle the adept follows his attractions. Is this not the law of the disembodied Principles? Why then not of the living also? As the social ties of the carnal man are too weak to callback the “Soul” of the deceased except where there is a mutual affinity which survives as a force in the region within the terrestrial region, so the calls for mere friendship or even enthusiastic regard are too feebler to draw the “Lha” who has passed on the stage of the journey to him he has left behind, unless a parallel development goes on. …..
…….All this I say to you because I read your heart and detect in it a shade of sadness, not to say disappointment , that hovers there. You have had other correspondents but are not perfectly satisfied. To gratify, I write you therefore with some effort to bid you keep a cheerful frame of mind. Your strivings, perplexities and forebodings are equally noticed , good and faithful friend. In the imperishable Record of the Masters you have written them all. There are registered your every deed and thought; for, though not a chela, as you say to my brother Morya, nor even a “protégé” --as you understand the term-still, you have stepped within the circle of our work, you have crossed the mystic line which separates your world from ours, and now whether you persevere or not; whether we become later on, in your sight, still more living real entities or vanish out of your mind like so many dream-fictions—perchance an ugly nightmare—you are virtually OURS. Your hidden Self has mirrored itself in our ‘Akasha’; your nature is yours, your essence is ours. The flame is distinct from the log of wood which has served it temporarily as fuel…..and whether we two meet face to face in in our grosser ‘rupas’—you cannot avoid meeting us in Real Existence. Yea, verily good friend, your Karma is ours, for you imprinted it daily and hourly upon the pages of that book where the minutest particulars of the individuals stepping inside our circle are preserved; and that your Karma is the only personality to be when you step beyond. In thought and deed, by day, by soul-struggles by nights, you have been writing the story of your desires and your spiritual development. This, every one does who approaches us with any earnestness of desire to become our co-worker; he himself “precipitates” the written entries by the identical process used by us when we write inside your closed letters and uncut pages and  books and pamphlets in transit. ………
During the past few months, especially when your weary brain was plunged in the torpor of sleep, your eager soul has often been searching after me, and the current of your thought been beating against my protective barriers of “Akasha” as the lapping wavelets against the rocky shore. What that “inner Self”  has longed to bind itself to, the carnal man has not ratified…..
If you hear seldom from me, never feel disappointed, my Brother. Nature has linked all parts of her Empire together by subtle threads of magnetic sympathy, and, there is a mutual correlation between a star and a man; thoughts run swifter than an electric fluid, and your thought will find me if projected by a pure impulse, as mine will find, has found, and often impressed your mind.  
       

Wednesday, 27 August 2014

The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky 9. Helena Blavatsky.s Parting Letter to Sinnett

From Helena Blavatsky's letter to Sinnett, probably her last letter

Good-bye then,dear Mr, and Mrs. Sinnett. Whether I die in a few months or remain two or three years in solitude I am as good as dead--already. Forget me and try to deserve personal communication with the Master....and then if you succeed as I succeeded you shall be hooted and insulted as I was, and see whether you can stand it...I am tired, tired, tired and so disgusted that Death herself with her first hours of horror is preferable to this. Let the whole world, with the exception of a fewfriends and my Hindu occultists, believe me a fraud. I will not deny it --even to their faces.
Good-bye again. May your life be happy and prosperous and Mrs. S's old age more healthy than her youth. Forgive me the annoyance I may have caused you and--forget.
Yours to the end
H.P. Blavatsky

The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky 8. Master M's Parting Letter to Sinnett



The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky
8.
Master M’s Parting letter
"At a stone's throw from the old Lamasery stands the old tower, within whose bosom have gestated generations of Bodhisattvas. It is there, where now rests your friend--my brother, the light of my soul, to whom I made a faithful promise to watch during his absence over his work."

From Master M's parting letter addressed to the Theosophical Society in general expressing sadness over Master K.H.'s withdrawal and final retreat into silence.

The masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky 7 Precipitation



The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky
7.
Excerpts from Mahatma Letters To Sinnett:
Precipitation
From Letter2 Section1 On Adept:
The adept is the rare efflorescence of a generation of enquirers; and to become one, he must obey the inward impulse of his soul irrespective of the prudential considerations of worldly science or sagacity…Your desire is to be brought to communicate with one of us directly, without the agency of either Mad, B. or any medium….Your idea would be to obtain such communication either by letters—as the present one—or by audible words so as to be guided by one of us in the management and instruction of the Society. You seek all this, and yet you say that hitherto you have not found “sufficient reason” to give up your “modes of life” directly hostile to such communications. This is hardly reasonable.
Same Letter on Motives:
“Your motives are (1) The desire to receive positive and unimpeachable proofs that there really are forces in nature of which science knows nothing; (2) The hope to appropriate them some day—the sooner the better, for you do not like to wait—so as to enable yourself—(a) to demonstrate their existence to a few chosen western minds; (b) to contemplate future life as an objective reality built upon the rock of Knowledge—not of faith; and finally, (c) to learn—most important this, among all your motives, perhaps, though the most occult and the best guarded—the whole truth about our Lodges and ourselves; to get in short, the positive assurance that the “Brothers” –of whom everyone hears so much and sees so little are real entities, not fictions of a disordered hallucinated brain. Such viewed in their best light appear to be your motives in addressing me. …..”
“To our minds then, these motives, sincere and worthy of every serious consideration from the worldly standpoint, appear ‘selfish’. …”
“They are selfish because you must be aware that the chief object of the T.S. is not so much to gratify individual aspirations as to serve our fellow men; and the real value of this term “selfish”, which may jar upon your ear, has a peculiar significance with us which it cannot have with you……Yet you have ever discussed only to put down the idea of a universal Brotherhood, questioned its usefulness, and advised to remodel the T. S. on the principle of a college for the special study of occultism. This, my respected and esteemed friend and Brother—will never do!”
Most of the Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett were not ‘precipitated’, but exchanged in the normal mode—by post or via a worldly, human courier.
From Section1 Letter 3B.
The difficulty you spoke last night—with respect to the interchange of our letters, I will try to remove. One of our pupils will shortly visit Lahore and the North West Provinces, and an address will be sent to you which you can always use; unless, indeed, you would prefer corresponding through—pillows. Please do note that the present (letter) is not dated from a ‘Lodge’, but from a Kashmir valley.
About ‘Precipitation’ and the ‘precipitated’ letters;
Though there are allusions to these phenomena at some places among the “Letters”, there is no explanation provided for them. The following allusion occurs in Letter6, Sect. 1.
“For whether I “precipitate” or dictate the letters myself, the difference in time saved is very minute. I have to ‘think’ it over, to photograph every word and sentence carefully in my brain before it can be repeated by “precipitation”. As the fixing of chemically prepared surface of the images formed by the camera requires a previous arrangement within the focus of the object to be presented, for otherwise—as often found in bad photographs—the legs of the sitter might appear out of all proportion with the head, and so on, so we have to first arrange our sentences and impress every letter to appear on paper in our mind before it becomes fit to be read. For the present , it is all I can tell you. When science will have learned more about the mystery of the ‘lithophyl’ (or ‘lithobiblion’), and hoe the impress of leaves comes originally to take place on stones, then will I be able to make you better understand the process.”
Another allusion:letter33:Section 3: “precipitation”
“Very often, our very letters are written in our handwritings by our ‘chelas’. Thus last year, some of my letters to you were ‘precipitated’.
Allusion to the more general practice of writing the letters in the ordinary way:Letter8:Sect.1
“Time is precious and writing material still more so. “Precipitation”-- in your case having become unlawful; lack of –whether ink or paper—standing no better chance and I being far away from home, and at a place where a stationer’s shop is less needed than a breathing air, our correspondence threatens to break very abruptly unless I manage my stock in hand judiciously.”
One more allusion to precipitation and I take a break:
“I believe you are now satisfied with my portrait made by Herr Schmiechen and as dissatisfied with the one you have? Yet all are like in their way. Only while the others are the productions of chelas, the last one was painted with M.’s (Master Morya) hand on the artist’s head, and often on his arm. “

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky:6. Excerpts



The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky
6.
Excerpts From Mahatma Letters to A.P.Sinnett
The following are chosen at random without any comments, with the hope that some perspective will emerge gradually and some light may be thrown on the Masters and their thoughts.
1)      From Section 1: The Occult World Series:1880-81:Letter No. 1:Received SimlaOct15th,1880
On what was called ‘phenomenon’ in those days:
“Very true, we work by natural, not supernatural means and laws. But as on the one hand Science would find itself unable (in its present state) to account for the wonders given in its name, and on the other the ignorant masses would still be left to view the phenomenon in the light of a miracle, everyone who would thus be made a witness to the occurrence would be thrown off his balance and the results would be deplorable. Believe me, it would be so—especially for yourself who originated the idea, and the devoted woman who so foolishly rushes into the wide open door leading to notoriety. This door, though opened by so friendly a hand as yours, would prove very soon a trap—and a fatal one indeed for her. And such is not surely your object?”
2)From Miscellaneous Letters:Letter No.98:
On Tibet and Civilization
For centuries we have had in Tibet a moral, pure hearted , simple people, unblest with civilization, hence –untainted by its vices. For ages has been Tibet the last corner of the globe not so entirely corrupted as to preclude the mingling together of the two atmospheres—the physical and the spiritual. And he (Mr. A. O. Hume) would have us exchange this for ‘his’ ideal of civilization and Govt.! This is pure self peroration!...
Now really, Mr. H. ought to be sent by an international Committee of Philanthropists, as a Friend of Perishing Humanity to teach our Dalai Lamas—wisdom. Why he does not straight-way sit down and frame a plan for something like Plato’s Ideal Republic with a new scheme for everything under the Sun and moon—passes my poor comprehension!......
In less than 24 hours he would paralyse any one of us (Brothers) who might be unfortunate enough to come within a mile of him merely by his monotonous piping about his own views…Such men as he make able statesmen, orators, anything you like but—never Adepts.

The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky 5.



The Masters Who Guided Helena Blavatsky
5.
Dr. William Hubbe- Schleiden
Dr. Hubbe-Schleiden’s first visit to Madame Blavatsky was sometime between September to December, 1884 when she stayed with Gebhards at Elberfeld, Germany. The letter he wrote to Countess Constance Wachtmeister( the lady who was ‘sent’ to help her while she was at Wurzburg) is included in ‘Reminiscences of H. P. Blavatsky and The Secret Doctrine’ by C. Wachtmeister. In this letter of January 1893, he says: “I did not pay much attention to the manner of her work from the standpoint of a hunter for the phenomena, and did not control it for that purpose; but I know that I saw a good deal of the well-known blue K. H. handwriting as corrections and annotations on her manuscript as well as in books that lay occasionally on her desk. And I noticed this principally in the morning before she had commenced her work. I slept on the couch in her study after she had withdrawn for the night, and the couch stood only a few feet away from her desk. I remember well my astonishment one morning when I got up to find a great many pages of foolscap covered with that with that blue pencil handwriting lying on her own manuscript, at her place on her desk. How these papers got there I do not know, but I did not see them before I went to sleep and no person had been bodily in the room during the night, for I am a light sleeper”.
“I must say that the view I took then was the same that I hold now. I never did and never shall judge of the value and the origin of any mental product from the way and manner in which it is produced. And for this reason I withheld my opinion then, thinking and saying: “I shall wait till ‘The Secret Doctrine’ is finished and then I can read it quietly; that will be the test for me, the only one that will be any good.”
“This is the reason why on the night of my last parting from H. P. B., the two ‘certificates’ were given to me. At least I found them in my copy of Hodgson’s S. P. R. Report after I had left her…”
The text of this ‘certificate’, which was a letter from Master M is as follows:
“If this can be of any use or help to Dr. Hubbe-Schleiden—though I doubt it –I, the humble undersigned Fakir, certify that the “Secret Doctrine” is dictated to Upasika partly by myself and partly by my Brother K. H.
M.’. 
 (‘Upasika’ is a Sanskrit term for a female disciple, the masculine noun being ‘Upasak’ ; literally it means ‘the one whose seat is lower (subordinate) to (the Guru)’. The observance and adherence to the inner hierarchy was mandatory to The Brotherhood, and H. P. B. held her Masters in the utmost reverence in her heart and practice.)
The second ‘certificate’ received by Doctor was in blue crayon, and was contained in an envelope similar to the first one, according to Ernst Pieper, the person who made the facsimile copies of the four letters received by the Doctor.
Its text is as follows: “I wonder if this note of mine is worthy of occupying a select spot with the documents reproduced, and which of the peculiarities of the ‘Blavatskian style of writing it will be found to most resemble? The present is simply to satisfy the Dr. that---“the more proof given the less believed.” Let him take my advice and not make these two documents public. It is for his own satisfaction that the undersigned is happy to assure him that ‘The Secret Doctrine when ready, will be the triple production of M, Upasika and the Doctor’s most humble servant.
S.E.C.                                                                                                                                                                      K.H.
The reference; “the documents reproduced” is most probably, to Richard Hodgson’s Report published by ‘The Society for Psychical Research’ in its proceedings, and which was responsible for raising doubts in the minds of people about the existence of the ‘Masters’. We found Dr. Hubbe-Schleiden alluding to the same ‘S.P.R. Report’ at the end of his letter to Constance Wachtmeister quoted above."

[Next; Some excerpts from ‘The Mahatma Letters’ received by A.P. Sinnett]  

   
 .